A prelude to war
David Bar-Illan
(December 15) - What supporters of the proposed agreement with
Syria expect is clear.
Once the treaty is signed, the dream of comprehensive peace in the
Middle East will finally materialize. Israel and its neighbors will be
swamped with investors. Tourism will burgeon. And free movement of
people and goods will transform the Arab dictatorships into
enlightened, advanced societies. Surely, relinquishing the Golan, painful
though it may be, is not too high a price for so promising an outcome.
True, even the terminally optimistic realize that the Golan will not be the
last Israeli concession. The "root cause" of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the
Palestinian problem, must also be addressed. But the momentum
created by peace with Syria, they believe, will persuade the Palestinians
to reach a reasonable compromise.
To debunk this utopian scenario is all too easy. The expectation that,
once Israel "returns to its natural size," the Arab regimes will discard
antisemitic incitement, change textbooks, reduce military budgets,
seriously fight anti-Israel terrorism, support Israel in the international
arena, and promote peaceful cooperation instead of Israel's
delegitimation is a wish-dream that belongs in fairy tales, not in Middle
East reality.
As recent experience has shown, the more concessionary and
conciliatory Israel is, the weaker it is perceived to be, and the more
likely it is to be subjected to escalating demands. Nor is there any
evidence that peace and stability attract investors rather than the
prospect of profits and a business-friendly environment. Some of the
poorest countries in the world are peaceful and stable.
Before surrendering the Golan, it may be useful to remember that
unlike Israelis and other Westerners, whose passion for instant
gratification is quintessentially summarized in the slogan "peace now,"
Arabs view the conflict with an historic perspective. They believe the
Zionist enterprise is a foreign invasion like the Crusades, and that
regardless of its current viability it is doomed to fail.
When the 1973 war made them realize that Israel could not be defeated
in a frontal military attack, they changed tactics, not goals. The Arab
League and the PLO constructed "the plan of stages," which envisioned
retrieving as much territory as possible by peaceful means and
attacking Israel only after it becomes diminished and demoralized.
In Arab eyes, the plan is proceeding nicely despite internecine bickering.
Israel's gains in the 1967 war are being gradually eliminated, and the
military balance is changing. Egypt, which in 1967 was a second-rate
power equipped with inferior Soviet arms, now has a powerful,
American-armed military force. Despite traditional American promises to
maintain Israel's qualitative edge, the Egyptian army has been supplied
with sophisticated arms Israel does not have.
The Syrian army now expects to undergo a similar transformation.
Ill-equipped and strapped for funds, it will be armed and trained by the
US. And since the administration has not demanded that it withdraw
from Lebanon, it will be able to threaten Israel on two fronts.
The basic premise of President Clinton's Pax Americana now being
imposed on the region is that the main players should depend on
American aid and arms, giving Washington control over their military
moves. That in the volatile Middle East such calculations do not always
work was evinced in Iran, where the vast American-built military
infrastructure fell into the hands of the ayatollahs.
To make the impending agreement palatable, a campaign of purification
of the Assad regime has been launched by both the US and Israel. But
Assad has not changed. He is a ruthless despot, a sponsor of
terrorism, and a major drug exporter who has kept Syria isolated,
oppressed, and poor.
Touted as a man of his word, Assad has broken virtually every
agreement he has ever made with Turkey, the Arab countries, and the
US. The only area in which he avoids trouble is the Golan, where the
Israeli army is within striking distance of Damascus.
Nor is it likely that peace with Israel will make Syria "join the world."
Totalitarian regimes know how to filter foreign influences.
Chances are the opposite will happen. Syria considers not only
Lebanon, but Israel and Jordan as part of Greater Syria. It is a belief
deeply rooted in its history and national mystique, and openly shared
by Israeli Arab leaders. Syrian free access to these leaders is almost
certain to create a wave of irredentism, which will transform today's
demands for Arab autonomy in Galilee to agitation for secession.
Combined with Syrian presence near (if not on) the Kinneret, the
prospect of such agitation makes Syria's reoccupation of the Golan a
decisive step toward the realization of the plan of stages.
And, lest we forget, the last stage of this plan is war.
|