Hizballah Leaders: Terrorism against Israel to Continue
even after IDF Withdrawal
Dr. Reuven Erlich, Research Fellow
International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Herzliya
December 27, 1998
Recently three senior Hizballah leaders have made pronouncements
concerning the future of terrorist operations in the case of a
unilateral IDF withdrawal from southern Lebanon. The three were:
the head of the organization, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah; the head of
the “Political Council,” Mohammed Ra’ed; and parliament
member Mohammed Fnesh. According to these pronouncements,
even the withdrawal of the Israeli Army from southern Lebanon
will not bring about a cessation of terrorist activity against
“northern Palestine,” and that “the occupier must be pursued
even after withdrawal.” The Hizballah’s scenario anticipates the
perpetration of terrorism from southern Lebanese territory by
Palestinian groups, apparently with Hizballah assistance, until the
achievement of the goal of “the liberation of all of Palestine.” At
the same time the Hizballah leaders repeated their call for the
continuation of Palestinian terrorism against Israeli soldiers and
civilians until the obliteration of Israel.
Following are some quotations:
Mohammed Ra’ed, head of the “Political Council” of Hizballah,
and member of the Lebanese parliament, at a banquet to honor the
end of fast of Ramadan (as quoted by Radio Nur on December 24,
1998):
“There are numerous ways in which we can pursue the enemies,
even after they withdraw from our occupied land . . . we will
force the enemy to give an accounting for the crimes committed in
the course of the invasion of Lebanon.”
Mohammed Fnesh, parliament member on behalf of the Hizballah,
at a memorial service in Shahabieh for one of the fighters:
“The enemy has only one option, and that is to withdraw from
our land without conditions or reservations . . . we will not agree
for anyone to reward the occupier for his aggression. What is
needed is to pursue him even after his withdrawal in order to
exact payment for the loss of life and property caused us by his
occupation.” (Radio Nur, December 27, 1998)
>From an interview on “Orbit” television with Hizballah leader
Sheikh Hassan Nasrallahh (December 15, 1998):
“. . .Palestine is Palestinian, Arab and Muslim land; Palestine
stretches from the Sea to the River. That is Palestine of 1948.
Rights do not change with the passage of time. Even with the
passage of 100 or 200 or 300 years . . .”
In answer to the question whether Syria and Lebanon might act to
stop Hizballah’s activities after an IDF withdrawal from the
Security Zone:
“It isn’t possible. No factor in Lebanon—not the opposition, no
Hizballah, not the Lebanese army, not the Lebanese government,
and not Syria—none of them will agree to come to the South in
order to guard the border of the Israeli entity . . .Let’s assume that
a certain group—not from Hizballah; we’re not saying what
Hizballah will do in future; we’ve have postponed that decision
for later on. Assume that a Palestinian group crosses the border
into northern Palestine in order to carry out an operation there.
They [the Palestinians] will say, ‘We are Palestinians and this is
our land. We are fighting to liberate our land and this is a
resistance action and not terrorism. If Lebanon were to give
guarantees to the government of the Israeli enemy then the
Lebanese government would be responsible and would be blamed .
. .is there any one in Lebanon that would agree to this?”
In answer to the question of whether the Israelis would agree to
withdraw without guarantees that they would not be attacked:
“. . .We must expect the Israelis to realize that they are occupiers,
and that in Palestine too they are occupiers. In the very nature of
things they must be anxious and worried. It isn’t natural that I
would give them guarantees.” Later in the interview, he says, “ .
. It isn’t my problem whether the Israelis will or will not live in
peace in northern Palestine.”
In answer to a question as to why the same Palestinian groups did
not attack Israel from the Syrian border, from the South or from
Jordan, but rather from the Lebanese border: “If others make
mistakes, must I also make the same mistakes?”
Hizballah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, at the conference of
Palestinian opposition groups held in Damascus on December 12,
1998, as quoted by Radio al-Quds:
“ . . .the Palestinian National Covenant remains valid as long as
there is a knife in the hands of a Palestinian woman with which
to stab a soldier or a settler. The Palestinian National Covenant
remains valid as long as there are suicide bombers (who sacrifice
themselves in the Holy name of Allah) to carry out attacks in
Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv. The Palestinian National Covenant
remains valid as long as there is a Palestinian child who hurls a
stone at an Israeli soldier, and whose eyes are fixed on Palestine,
from the River to the Sea.”
What is exceptional in these declarations is the fact that, until
recently, Hizballah tended to preserve certain vagueness with
regard to the continuation of terrorist activity from South Lebanon
after an Israeli withdrawal. The current pronouncements are in
direct contradiction to assumptions that an IDF withdrawal will
lead to a cessation of terrorism from Lebanon, and to Hizballah’s
conversion from terrorist movement to political party.
|